vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BT Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.4× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). BT Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs -697.1%, a 720.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. BT Brands, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($261.8K vs $-42.0M).
BT Brands, Inc.BTBDEarnings & Financial Report
BT Group plc is a British multinational telecommunications holding company headquartered in London, England. It has operations in around 180 countries and is the largest provider of fixed-line, broadband and mobile services in the UK, and also provides subscription television and IT services.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
BTBD vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $915.0K | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.1% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | 23.7% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 516.9% | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $915.0K | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0K | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-329.8K | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-219.5K | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.0K | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-445.7K | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.0% | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $11.9M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7M | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.0M | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $734.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $325.2K | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $261.8K | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.36× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $325.2K | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.4K | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-306.7K | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.3K | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.5K | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-408.9K | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8K | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-431.1K | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.4K | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.7K | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-521.3K | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.3% | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.