vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BTCS Inc. (BTCS) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $7.1M, roughly 1.9× BTCS Inc.). On growth, BTCS Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (205.5% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, BTCS Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (296.4% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
BTCS vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 12.4% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 205.5% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.58 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $739.2K | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $561.2K | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $451.4K | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.6M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.7M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.9% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.9% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.4% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1328.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 140.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1022.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1223.0% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1198.9% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2715.3% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.56 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.63 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $139.4M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $214.6M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $639.2K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.9K | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $254.5K | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $536.7K | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $670.6K | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $139.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.3M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $214.6M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.2M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.8M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.5M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -138.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-15.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.5M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-695.2K | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-924.1K | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-769.0K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -138.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -48.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -112.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BTCS
| Builder Plus | $5.9M | 83% |
| Other | $1.2M | 17% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
