vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BIT ORIGIN Ltd (BTOG) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8M vs $2.9M, roughly 1.3× BIT ORIGIN Ltd). Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -117.1% vs -244.4%, a 127.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Origin Systems, Inc. was an American video game developer based in Austin, Texas. It was founded on March 3, 1983, by Richard Garriott and his brother Robert. Origin is best known for their groundbreaking work in multiple genres of video games, such as the Ultima and Wing Commander series. The company was purchased by Electronic Arts in 1992.

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is a precious metals royalty and streaming firm focused on gold, silver, and strategic mineral assets primarily across North America. It partners with mining operators to earn stable, leveraged returns without incurring the high costs and operational risks of direct mine ownership, catering to investors seeking low-volatility exposure to precious metals markets.

BTOG vs MTA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MTA
MTA
1.3× larger
MTA
$3.8M
$2.9M
BTOG
Higher net margin
MTA
MTA
127.3% more per $
MTA
-117.1%
-244.4%
BTOG

Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Revenue
$2.9M
$3.8M
Net Profit
$-7.1M
$-4.4M
Gross Margin
50.4%
Operating Margin
-233.8%
Net Margin
-244.4%
-117.1%
Revenue YoY
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$-1.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
$3.8M
Q2 25
$2.1M
Q1 25
$1.3M
Q3 24
$3.3M
Q1 24
$981.0K
Q4 23
$2.9M
Net Profit
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
$-4.4M
Q2 25
$-3.2M
Q1 25
$-1.7M
Q3 24
$-4.0M
Q1 24
$-1.4M
Q4 23
$-7.1M
Gross Margin
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
50.4%
Q2 25
39.7%
Q1 25
39.2%
Q3 24
48.5%
Q1 24
59.3%
Q4 23
Operating Margin
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
-102.5%
Q3 24
-176.4%
Q1 24
-121.5%
Q4 23
-233.8%
Net Margin
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
-117.1%
Q2 25
-151.3%
Q1 25
-138.0%
Q3 24
-120.3%
Q1 24
-138.2%
Q4 23
-244.4%
EPS (diluted)
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
$-1.99

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$6.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$9.0M
Total Assets
$13.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
$6.9M
Stockholders' Equity
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
$9.0M
Total Assets
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
$13.5M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-4.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTOG
BTOG
MTA
MTA
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
$-4.6M

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons