vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and SouthState Bank Corp (SSB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $661.7M, roughly 1.5× SouthState Bank Corp). SouthState Bank Corp runs the higher net margin — 34.1% vs 1.2%, a 32.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SouthState Bank Corp's revenue compounded faster (37.4% CAGR vs 1.9%).

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

SouthState Bank, based in Winter Haven, Florida, is an American bank and a subsidiary of SouthState Corporation, a bank holding company. As of May 26, 2025, the company had 371 branches in South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Virginia, Colorado and Texas.

BTU vs SSB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BTU
BTU
1.5× larger
BTU
$1.0B
$661.7M
SSB
Higher net margin
SSB
SSB
32.9% more per $
SSB
34.1%
1.2%
BTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SSB
SSB
Annualised
SSB
37.4%
1.9%
BTU

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Revenue
$1.0B
$661.7M
Net Profit
$12.4M
$225.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
0.8%
15.1%
Net Margin
1.2%
34.1%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
153.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$2.28

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
$661.7M
Q4 25
$1.0B
$581.1M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$599.7M
Q2 25
$890.1M
$577.9M
Q1 25
$937.0M
$544.5M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$369.8M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$351.5M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$350.3M
Net Profit
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
$225.8M
Q4 25
$12.4M
$247.7M
Q3 25
$-70.1M
$246.6M
Q2 25
$-27.6M
$215.2M
Q1 25
$34.4M
$89.1M
Q4 24
$37.8M
$144.2M
Q3 24
$101.3M
$143.2M
Q2 24
$199.4M
$132.4M
Operating Margin
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
15.1%
Q4 25
0.8%
54.3%
Q3 25
-8.0%
53.6%
Q2 25
-4.3%
48.8%
Q1 25
3.4%
22.3%
Q4 24
3.6%
50.7%
Q3 24
11.0%
53.1%
Q2 24
22.4%
49.3%
Net Margin
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
34.1%
Q4 25
1.2%
42.6%
Q3 25
-6.9%
41.1%
Q2 25
-3.1%
37.2%
Q1 25
3.7%
16.4%
Q4 24
3.4%
39.0%
Q3 24
9.3%
40.7%
Q2 24
19.1%
37.8%
EPS (diluted)
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
$2.28
Q4 25
$0.11
$2.47
Q3 25
$-0.58
$2.42
Q2 25
$-0.23
$2.11
Q1 25
$0.27
$0.87
Q4 24
$0.25
$1.88
Q3 24
$0.74
$1.86
Q2 24
$1.42
$1.73

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$575.3M
$2.9B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
$9.0B
Total Assets
$5.8B
$68.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
$2.9B
Q4 25
$575.3M
Q3 25
$603.3M
Q2 25
$585.9M
Q1 25
$696.5M
Q4 24
$700.4M
Q3 24
$772.9M
Q2 24
$621.7M
Total Debt
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$321.2M
Q3 25
$321.8M
Q2 25
$329.2M
Q1 25
$331.2M
Q4 24
$332.3M
Q3 24
$323.7M
Q2 24
$323.2M
Stockholders' Equity
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
$9.0B
Q4 25
$3.5B
$9.1B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$9.0B
Q2 25
$3.6B
$8.8B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$8.6B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$5.9B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$5.9B
Q2 24
$3.7B
$5.7B
Total Assets
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
$68.0B
Q4 25
$5.8B
$67.2B
Q3 25
$5.7B
$66.0B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$65.9B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$65.1B
Q4 24
$6.0B
$46.4B
Q3 24
$5.9B
$46.1B
Q2 24
$5.9B
$45.5B
Debt / Equity
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.09×
Q3 25
0.09×
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.09×
Q3 24
0.09×
Q2 24
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$68.6M
$232.1M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$122.4M
Q2 25
$23.2M
$72.6M
Q1 25
$119.9M
$-126.3M
Q4 24
$119.8M
$354.3M
Q3 24
$359.9M
$-246.8M
Q2 24
$7.8M
$126.8M
Free Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$215.5M
Q3 25
$101.7M
Q2 25
$52.5M
Q1 25
$-139.1M
Q4 24
$340.9M
Q3 24
$-254.2M
Q2 24
$117.3M
FCF Margin
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
Q4 25
37.1%
Q3 25
17.0%
Q2 25
9.1%
Q1 25
-25.5%
Q4 24
92.2%
Q3 24
-72.3%
Q2 24
33.5%
Capex Intensity
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.9%
Q3 25
3.5%
Q2 25
3.5%
Q1 25
2.4%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
2.1%
Q2 24
2.7%
Cash Conversion
BTU
BTU
SSB
SSB
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.53×
0.94×
Q3 25
0.50×
Q2 25
0.34×
Q1 25
3.49×
-1.42×
Q4 24
3.17×
2.46×
Q3 24
3.55×
-1.72×
Q2 24
0.04×
0.96×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

SSB
SSB

Net Interest Income$561.6M85%
Noninterest Income$100.1M15%

Related Comparisons