vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bioventus Inc. (BVS) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($168.3M vs $157.9M, roughly 1.1× Bioventus Inc.). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 9.3%, a 16.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bioventus Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.8% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $37.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Bioventus Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs 4.9%).
Bioventus Inc. is a global medical technology company specializing in orthobiologic solutions. It develops and commercializes products supporting bone and joint healing, musculoskeletal pain management, and regenerative care for patients. Its offerings serve orthopedic clinicians, physical therapists, and patients across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, with core segments covering surgical orthobiologics and non-surgical pain relief solutions.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
BVS vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $157.9M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $14.8M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 68.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.3% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3902.8% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.21 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $157.9M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.7M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.7M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.9M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.6M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.5M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.6M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-388.0K | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.2M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 68.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.0% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.40 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $51.2M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $184.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $683.6M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $51.2M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.2M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.6M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.1M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.2M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $184.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $161.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.3M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $683.6M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $701.6M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $706.8M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $691.4M | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $728.0M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $769.5M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $792.2M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.2M | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $38.0M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.4M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 23.7% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.57× | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $72.1M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $38.0M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.1M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.3M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $37.4M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.3M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.1M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.3M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.9% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.57× | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.54× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.48× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BVS
| Pain Treatments | $71.1M | 45% |
| Surgical Solutions | $48.9M | 31% |
| Restorative Therapies | $19.5M | 12% |
| Other | $18.4M | 12% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
