vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.2× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -3.5%, a 28.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
CTRN vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
