vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BWX Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($885.8M vs $745.1M, roughly 1.2× Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 10.5%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 12.3%). BWX Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($56.8M vs $-64.6M). Over the past eight quarters, BWX Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 11.7%).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. operates a network of premium athletic, fitness and wellness destinations across the United States. It offers diverse services including state-of-the-art gym facilities, group exercise classes, personal training, spa treatments, nutrition coaching, youth programs and co-working spaces for consumers pursuing holistic healthy lifestyles.
BWXT vs LTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $885.8M | $745.1M |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $123.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 17.4% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | $745.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $782.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | $761.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | $706.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | $663.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | $693.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $667.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $604.0M | $596.7M |
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $102.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | $76.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.5M | $24.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 46.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | 46.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $499.8M | $204.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | $204.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $120.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.9M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.2M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $7.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | $239.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.8M | $-64.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | 40.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $295.3M | $-21.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $239.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | $195.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | $183.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | $163.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $170.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $90.4M |
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $41.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-66.4M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | -11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | 2.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 2.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 3.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 3.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | 3.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
LTH
| Membership | $535.1M | 72% |
| In Center | $191.2M | 26% |
| Other | $18.8M | 3% |
