vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BXP, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($872.1M vs $853.2M, roughly 1.0× Kontoor Brands, Inc.). BXP, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 4.3%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.3% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 1.3%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
BXP vs KTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $853.2M |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | $36.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 27.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | -47.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $853.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $658.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $622.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $699.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $670.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $606.9M |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $51.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 44.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $82.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $529.6M |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $334.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $269.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $224.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $735.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $740.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $745.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $749.7M |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $529.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $498.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $426.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $400.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $356.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $367.2M |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.74× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $228.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $64.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $96.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $74.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $129.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $92.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | 15.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | 1.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
KTB
| International Member | $292.0M | 34% |
| CTC Triangle B.V | $192.7M | 23% |
| Lee Segment | $186.7M | 22% |
| Helly Hansen Segment | $185.9M | 22% |
