vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BYLINE BANCORP, INC. (BY) and Baozun Inc. (BZUN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BYLINE BANCORP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($112.4M vs $84.2M, roughly 1.3× Baozun Inc.). BYLINE BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 33.4% vs -2.0%, a 35.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Byline Bank is a bank headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States. It is the primary subsidiary of Byline Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, and the 4th largest SBA 7(a) lender.
Baozun Inc is a leading digital commerce service provider focused on the Chinese market. It delivers full-stack e-commerce solutions including official store operation, digital marketing, logistics and fulfillment, customer support, and technical infrastructure services for global and local consumer brands across fashion, beauty, FMCG, consumer electronics, and other core retail segments.
BY vs BZUN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $112.4M | $84.2M |
| Net Profit | $37.6M | $-1.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.7% |
| Net Margin | 33.4% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $112.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $84.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.68 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.4M | $6.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $10.7M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $25.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $198.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $563.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
