vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Broadway Financial Corp (BYFC) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.4× Broadway Financial Corp). Broadway Financial Corp runs the higher net margin — 1934.0% vs -13.2%, a 1947.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 10.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 9.7%).
Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
BYFC vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.4M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.0M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 1934.0% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.8% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.8M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $752.0K | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0K | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0K | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-154.0K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -256.2% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.9% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1934.0% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -264.2% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.0% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.86 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.39 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.5M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $262.8M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.8M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.1M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $262.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $284.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $283.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $285.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.2M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.1M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $230.0K | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.22× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $230.0K | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 118.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -149.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BYFC
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
