vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $790.1M, roughly 1.2× CALERES INC). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs 0.3%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 1.4%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 0.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
CAL vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $852.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $910.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $70.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $60.9M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $1.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $344.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $333.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $802.0M |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
