vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.6× CALERES INC). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 0.3%, a 15.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 6.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
CAL vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
