vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.4× CALERES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 0.3%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
CAL vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
