vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and HAEMONETICS CORP (HAE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HAEMONETICS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.7× CALERES INC). HAEMONETICS CORP runs the higher net margin — 7.3% vs 0.3%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 4.8%). HAEMONETICS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($209.9M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, HAEMONETICS CORP's revenue compounded faster (99.2% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Haemonetics Corporation is a global provider of blood and plasma supplies and services. The company was founded in Natick, Massachusetts by Dr. Allen (Jack) Latham in the 1970s.
CAL vs HAE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $97.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 83.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | -42.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $327.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $321.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $330.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $348.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $345.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $336.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $97.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 59.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 55.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 54.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 52.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 83.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 11.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $1.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $245.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $796.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $363.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $296.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $292.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $306.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $320.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $299.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $344.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $796.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $911.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $849.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $882.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $820.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $906.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $878.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $905.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $293.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $209.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 15.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 3.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $417.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $293.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $116.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $-27.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-33.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -9.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 2.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | -0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
HAE
Segment breakdown not available.
