vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. (HCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $458.6M, roughly 1.7× WARRIOR MET COAL, INC.). WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 0.3%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (52.1% vs 6.6%). Over the past eight quarters, WARRIOR MET COAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (ticker HCC) is a U.S.-headquartered mining enterprise that produces and distributes high-grade metallurgical coal, a key raw material for steel production. It serves steel manufacturers and industrial clients across core markets including North America, Europe, and Asia.
CAL vs HCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $458.6M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $72.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 17.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 52.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $1.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $458.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $328.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $297.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $299.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $297.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $327.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $396.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $41.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $70.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 17.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $1.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $233.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $154.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $336.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $383.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $454.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $491.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $583.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $709.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $154.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $154.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $154.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $153.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $153.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $153.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $147.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 3.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 6.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 47.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 2.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
HCC
| Sales | $448.5M | 98% |
| Other revenues | $10.1M | 2% |
