vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP (VLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $540.4M, roughly 1.5× VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP). VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 0.3%, a 30.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 6.6%). Over the past eight quarters, VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (16.0% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORPVLYEarnings & Financial Report
North Valley Bancorp was a bank holding company headquartered in Redding, California. The company operated 22 branches. The company was acquired by TriCo Bancshares in October 2014, in a merger valued at more than $178 million.
CAL vs VLY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $540.4M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $163.9M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 13.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 54.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $540.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $464.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $446.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $432.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $420.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $423.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $410.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $401.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $163.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $163.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $133.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $106.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $115.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $97.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $70.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 47.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 23.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 42.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 17.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $7.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $64.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $6.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $64.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $64.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $63.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $62.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $61.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $62.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $62.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $62.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $196.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $159.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $392.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $-157.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $214.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $187.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $156.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $385.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $-160.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $211.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 91.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | -39.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 52.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | -0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 3.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | -1.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 3.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
VLY
Segment breakdown not available.
