vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $432.7M, roughly 1.8× Koppers Holdings Inc.). Koppers Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 0.3%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -9.3%). Koppers Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.5M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
CAL vs KOP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $432.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $29.7M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 11.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 391.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $1.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $432.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $485.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $504.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $456.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $477.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $554.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $563.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $497.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 19.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $1.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $928.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $574.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.62× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $928.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $977.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $989.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $939.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $989.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $877.6M |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $574.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $545.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $526.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $498.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $488.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $532.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $509.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $505.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $45.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $28.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 1.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $67.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $74.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $-12.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $37.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-38.6M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | -0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
