vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and Lineage, Inc. (LINE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lineage, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.7× CALERES INC). CALERES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -7.3%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 3.1%). Lineage, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($35.0M vs $-12.4M).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
CAL vs LINE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $-100.0M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 2.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-100.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $-71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-40.0M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 33.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | -38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -3.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $-2.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $-0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $8.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $19.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $173.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $19.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $19.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $19.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $18.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $230.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $35.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 2.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $230.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $258.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $139.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $186.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $155.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $105.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-42.0M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
LINE
| Warehousing Operations | $883.0M | 64% |
| Other | $308.0M | 22% |
| Warehouse Lease | $60.0M | 4% |
| Food Sales | $52.0M | 4% |
| E Commerce And Other | $46.0M | 3% |
| Railcar Lease | $23.0M | 2% |
| Service Other | $5.0M | 0% |
