vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.6× Lineage, Inc.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -3.9%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
LINE vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-51.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | -3.9% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $-51.0M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-71.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-485.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.2% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.4% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | -3.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.4% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.1% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.18 | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.44 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.52 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.44 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.46 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.1B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $19.0B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $409.0M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.1B | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $19.0B | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.4B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $130.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-31.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
