vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $665.5M, roughly 1.2× Natera, Inc.). Natera, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs 0.3%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs 6.6%). Natera, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.8M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
CAL vs NTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $665.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $47.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 187.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $592.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $546.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $501.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $476.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $439.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $413.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $367.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $-100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-66.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $-37.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-67.6M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | -20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $878.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $836.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $794.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $73.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $37.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 1.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $109.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $59.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $27.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.
