vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and PERRIGO Co plc (PRGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PERRIGO Co plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.4× CALERES INC). CALERES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -127.8%, a 128.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -2.5%). PERRIGO Co plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($148.6M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 1.3%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Perrigo Company plc is an American Irish-registered manufacturer of private label over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, and while 70% of Perrigo's net sales are from the U.S. healthcare system, Perrigo is legally headquartered in Ireland for tax purposes, which accounts for 0.60% of net sales. In 2013, Perrigo completed the sixth-largest US corporate tax inversion in history when it reregistered its tax status to Ireland to avoid U.S. corporate taxes. Perrigo maintains its corporate headquarters ...
CAL vs PRGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $-1.4B |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -116.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -127.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | -3093.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-10.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $-44.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $-108.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 37.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 33.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -116.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -127.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $-10.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $454.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $409.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $558.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $542.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $658.5M |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $10.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $175.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $148.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 13.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $145.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $175.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $75.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $312.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $42.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $148.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $274.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-26.5M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 6.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | -0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
PRGO
| Consumer Self Care Americas | $697.0M | 63% |
| Digestive Health | $123.9M | 11% |
| Nutrition | $108.3M | 10% |
| Healthy Lifestyle | $94.8M | 9% |
| Pain And Sleep Aids | $87.1M | 8% |
