vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snowflake Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $790.1M, roughly 1.5× CALERES INC). CALERES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -24.2%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snowflake Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.7% vs 6.6%). Snowflake Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($113.6M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Snowflake Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.1% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Snowflake Inc. is an American cloud-based data platform company founded in San Mateo, California, and headquartered in Bozeman, Montana. It operates a platform that supports data analysis and simultaneous access to data sets with minimal latency. It operates on Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.
CAL vs SNOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $-294.0M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 67.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -27.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -24.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 28.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 9.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $986.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $942.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $828.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.1M | $774.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $-430.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-327.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $-324.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $-316.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $-317.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $-169.4M |
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | 67.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 66.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 66.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 66.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 67.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 68.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -39.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | -42.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | -35.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -26.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | -34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | -21.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.56 | $-0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.6M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $8.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $137.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $113.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $776.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $228.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $432.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $101.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $355.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.0M | $344.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $183.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $88.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $338.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $331.5M |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 42.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
SNOW
| Products | $1.2B | 96% |
| Professional Services And Other | $54.5M | 4% |
| Related Party | $6.7M | 1% |