vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CASEYS GENERAL STORES INC (CASY) and Freeport-McMoRan (FCX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Freeport-McMoRan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $4.5B, roughly 1.2× CASEYS GENERAL STORES INC). Freeport-McMoRan runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs 4.6%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CASEYS GENERAL STORES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -10.4%). CASEYS GENERAL STORES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($176.0M vs $-312.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CASEYS GENERAL STORES INC's revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs -7.9%).
Casey's Retail Company is a chain of convenience stores in the Midwestern and Southern United States. The company is headquartered in Ankeny, Iowa, a suburb of Des Moines. As of October 1, 2023, Casey's had 2,500 stores in 16 states. Following 7-Eleven's purchase of Speedway, Casey's is the third-largest convenience store chain in the United States and the largest that is wholly American-owned. It is one of two Iowa-based Fortune 500 companies. Casey's is famous for their pizza, including a b...
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., often called Freeport, is an American mining company based in the Freeport-McMoRan Center, in Phoenix, Arizona. The company is the world's largest producer of molybdenum, a major copper producer and operates the world's largest gold mine, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia.
CASY vs FCX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.5B | $5.3B |
| Net Profit | $206.3M | $565.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.0% | -21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.53 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | $206.3M | $565.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.1M | $793.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.9M | $721.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.9M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | $5.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.77 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.63 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.33 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.85 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.83 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.34 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.33 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $492.0M | $3.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $18.9B |
| Total Assets | $8.6B | $58.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $492.0M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $458.1M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $326.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.8M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.7M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.5M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.9M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.4B |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $17.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $17.0B |
| Q4 25 | $8.6B | $58.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $56.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2B | $56.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2B | $56.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $54.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $55.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $54.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2B | $54.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.52× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $347.1M | $693.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $176.0M | $-312.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.9% | -5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 19.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.68× | 1.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $682.2M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $347.1M | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $204.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $281.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $288.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.8M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $176.0M | $-312.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.4M | $608.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.1M | $934.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.7M | $-114.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.8M | $673.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $840.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.0M | $642.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.40× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.35× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.50× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.31× | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.41× | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CASY
Segment breakdown not available.
FCX
| Morenci | $2.5B | 47% |
| Grasberg Segment | $964.0M | 18% |
| Copper In Concentrates | $934.0M | 18% |
| Molybdenum | $541.0M | 10% |
| Gold | $388.0M | 7% |
