vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY) and IMAX CORP (IMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($222.8M vs $125.2M, roughly 1.8× IMAX CORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 0.5%, a 652.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 19.5%). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($363.7M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 12.8%).
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
CATY vs IMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $222.8M | $125.2M |
| Net Profit | $90.5M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 50.9% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | 653.4% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.5% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.9% | -88.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.33 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $222.8M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.6M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $196.6M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.8M | $86.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.5M | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.5M | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.5M | $89.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $175.2M | $79.1M |
| Q4 25 | $90.5M | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.5M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.4M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | 50.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.7% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 653.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.9% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 587.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.33 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.13 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.10 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $151.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $119.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $337.9M |
| Total Assets | $24.2B | $894.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $143.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $320.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $299.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $289.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $267.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $24.2B | $894.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1B | $889.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $868.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $848.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1B | $830.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3B | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2B | $827.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4B | $824.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $368.6M | $29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $363.7M | $28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 163.2% | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.07× | 46.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $672.7M | $118.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $368.6M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.6M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.2M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.9M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.2M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $363.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.1M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $325.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0M | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 163.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 174.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.5% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.8% | -15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.07× | 46.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.94× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.42× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.10× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.09× | 9.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | -3.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CATY
Segment breakdown not available.
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
