vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $23.1M, roughly 1.4× Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs -116.9%, a 158.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
CBK vs GLOO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $-38.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -82.0% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | -116.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | 12.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $-6.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $-38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -82.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | $-6.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | $176.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-444.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $206.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | $176.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-444.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $206.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-63.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-63.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -194.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -194.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
