vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and HARTE HANKS INC (HHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HARTE HANKS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.9M vs $23.1M, roughly 1.7× Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs 5.5%, a 35.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
CBK vs HHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $39.9M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -15.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.0M |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-335.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-392.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $142.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-27.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -61.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $20.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $91.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.0M |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $737.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-686.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-4.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-818.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-686.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-923.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $926.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
