vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $23.1M, roughly 1.1× Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs -5.7%, a 47.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
CBK vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.2M |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-77.7K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $163.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $191.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $721.9K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $668.3K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
ITP
Segment breakdown not available.
