vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. (CBK) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.1M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.4× DNA X, Inc.). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.3% vs -29.3%, a 70.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.CBKEarnings & Financial Report
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. operates as a U.S. regional bank holding company that provides a full suite of retail and commercial banking products and services to individual consumers, small and medium-sized businesses, and local institutional clients. Its core offerings include deposit accounts, lending solutions, wealth management, and tailored financial advisory services for regional markets.
CBK vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $9.5M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 41.3% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.5M |
| Q1 26 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.8% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -56.2% |
| Q1 26 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -57.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.77 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $118.2M | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M |
| Q1 26 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.2M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 115.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBK
| Net Interest Income | $20.5M | 89% |
| Noninterest Income | $2.6M | 11% |
SONM
Segment breakdown not available.
