vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $475.7M, roughly 1.1× COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 7.8%, a 22.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
CBSH vs DT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $515.5M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $40.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.1% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | -88.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | $515.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $493.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $477.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $445.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $418.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $399.2M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | $40.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | $57.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | $39.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | $361.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $38.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 81.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 82.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | 82.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $3.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $33.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $27.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $465.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | $33.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $269.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | $23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | $230.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $262.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $148.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $227.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 57.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 5.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 4.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | 5.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBSH
Segment breakdown not available.
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
