vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $323.3M, roughly 1.5× ECARX Holdings Inc.). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -21.4%, a 51.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 6.5%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
CBSH vs ECX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $323.3M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $-69.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -20.2% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | -21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $323.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $303.5M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $-69.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $-79.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | -22.2% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | -21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | -26.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $86.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $-293.7M |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $494.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $86.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $108.4M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $-293.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $-198.5M |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $494.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $555.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-82.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-86.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -26.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $-82.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | $-57.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $-86.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $-64.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | -21.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
