vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Genius Sports Ltd (GENI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Genius Sports Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($510.9M vs $475.7M, roughly 1.1× COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -12.3%, a 42.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Genius Sports Ltd's revenue compounded faster (129.2% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Genius Sports is a sports data and technology company that provides data management, video streaming and integrity services to sports leagues, bookmakers and media companies.
CBSH vs GENI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $510.9M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $-63.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | -12.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $335.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $119.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | $413.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $184.1M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | $-63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $-47.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $-47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $-35.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | -11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | -15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | -21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | -13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | -16.8% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | -21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | -19.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $280.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $724.5M |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $280.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $110.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $724.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $572.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $572.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $572.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $573.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $573.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $792.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $792.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $792.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | $775.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $775.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $775.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $81.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $69.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $33.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | $81.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | $69.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
