vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and GRIFFON CORP (GFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRIFFON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($649.1M vs $475.7M, roughly 1.4× COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 9.9%, a 19.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
CBSH vs GFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $649.1M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | -9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | $1.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $662.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | $632.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $659.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $647.8M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | $64.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $41.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | -20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 13.8% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $-2.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | $0.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $108.9M |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $107.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $133.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $63.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $214.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $223.5M |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $99.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $278.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | $122.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | $99.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $114.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $107.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | 2.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBSH
Segment breakdown not available.
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
