vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($550.2M vs $475.7M, roughly 1.2× COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -0.4%, a 30.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -22.2%). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is a global diversified industrial firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized processing equipment and durable industrial solutions. It serves food & beverage, agriculture, manufacturing, waste management sectors, with operations across North America, Europe, and APAC.
CBSH vs HI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $550.2M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | -22.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | -134.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | $550.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $652.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $598.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $715.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | $706.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $837.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $786.6M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | $75.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $-248.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | -32.7% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | -31.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | $-3.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $173.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $458.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $223.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-27.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | $67.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | $166.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | $45.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | $153.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | -1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | 11.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBSH
Segment breakdown not available.
HI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $256.5M | 47% |
| Transferred Over Time | $207.1M | 38% |
| Molding Technology Solutions | $86.6M | 16% |
