vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.9× Tecnoglass Inc.). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 10.6%, a 19.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
CBSH vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $219.7M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 23.3% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $574.8M |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $942.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | $34.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | 0.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBSH
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
