vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD (TSEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $351.2M, roughly 1.4× TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 15.2%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -1.7%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. is an Israeli company that manufactures integrated circuits using specialty process technologies, including SiGe, BiCMOS, Silicon Photonics, SOI, mixed-signal and RFCMOS, CMOS image sensors, non-imaging sensors, power management (BCD), and non-volatile memory (NVM) as well as MEMS capabilities. Tower Semiconductor also owns 51% of TPSCo, an enterprise with Nuvoton Technology Corporation Japan (NTCJ).
CBSH vs TSEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $351.2M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $53.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.7% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 15.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | -1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 4.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $351.2M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 15.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $265.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $265.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $3.0B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
