vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.1× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 29.8%, a 18.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
CBSH vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
