vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chemours Co (CC) and Digital Realty (DLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.2× Chemours Co). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs -3.5%, a 9.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.1% vs -2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Realty's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -1.2%).
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
CC vs DLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | 16.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | -10.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $80.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $2.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $22.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $49.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $21.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $21.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $48.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $48.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $45.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $45.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $45.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $43.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $719.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $641.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $399.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $769.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $566.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $573.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | 9.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 7.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
DLR
Segment breakdown not available.
