vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC (CCBG) and Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($63.5M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.4× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs 7.0%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 6.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 6.0%).
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
CCBG vs CMCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.5M | $46.9M |
| Net Profit | $13.7M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.0% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.7% | -33.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $38.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.80 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.83 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.74 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $552.9M | $231.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $339.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $552.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $512.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $495.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $476.5M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $461.0M | $231.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $448.3M | $220.3M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $321.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.6M | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $80.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 126.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.39× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $150.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $87.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 126.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.86× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.97× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.