vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC (CCBG) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $63.5M, roughly 1.6× CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC). CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs -7.0%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs 6.0%). CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($80.0M vs $14.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
CCBG vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.5M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.7M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.0% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.7% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.9M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.9M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 29.3% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.0% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 21.6% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.80 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.88 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.99 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.78 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.83 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.74 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $552.9M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $552.9M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.6M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $526.4M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $512.6M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $495.3M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $476.5M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $461.0M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $448.3M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.6M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $80.0M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 126.1% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.0% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.39× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $150.1M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $87.6M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.6M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.9M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.8M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | 126.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.86× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.97× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCBG
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |