vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) and Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheche Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.8M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.0× Gloo Holdings, Inc.). Cheche Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -116.9%, a 117.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Cheche Group Inc. is a leading automotive digital service provider headquartered in China. It offers integrated solutions including auto insurance intermediary services, smart auto after-sales support, and connected vehicle technology products, serving individual car owners, auto dealerships, and insurance partners across domestic and select Southeast Asian markets.
CCG vs GLOO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.8M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $153.6K | $-38.0M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -82.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | -116.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-6.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $153.6K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-492.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-196.7K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.0M | $15.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $193.3K | $176.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-444.4M |
| Total Assets | $203.5M | $206.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $193.3K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $176.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-444.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $203.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $206.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-63.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-63.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -194.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -194.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCG
Segment breakdown not available.
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
