vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $32.8M, roughly 1.8× Cheche Group Inc.). Cheche Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -171.1%, a 171.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Cheche Group Inc. is a leading automotive digital service provider headquartered in China. It offers integrated solutions including auto insurance intermediary services, smart auto after-sales support, and connected vehicle technology products, serving individual car owners, auto dealerships, and insurance partners across domestic and select Southeast Asian markets.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
CCG vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.8M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $153.6K | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.5% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.6M | $57.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | $153.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-492.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-196.7K | $-98.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.6M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $12.6M |
| Q1 26 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | -155.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | -171.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.0% | -279.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 42.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.00 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.0M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $193.3K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $203.5M | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.1M | $317.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.2M | $231.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $454.6M |
| Q1 26 | $193.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | $860.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.6M | $870.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $203.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.7M | $902.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.3M | $911.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.8M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0K | $-30.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-56.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.0M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.9% | -36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -4.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
