vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.5× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -35.0%, a 24.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs -23.6%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $16.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
CCRN vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
