vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRA GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($333.4M vs $236.8M, roughly 1.4× CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs -35.0%, a 52.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PRA GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -23.6%). CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.1M vs $-90.4M). Over the past eight quarters, PRA GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
CCRN vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $4.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
