vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Cintas (CTAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.3× Celanese Corp). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 0.6%, a 17.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs -7.0%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($425.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
CE vs CTAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $495.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 23.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $491.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $448.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $463.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $448.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $414.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $397.6M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 49.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 16.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $4.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $200.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $10.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $200.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $138.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $264.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $243.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $342.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $128.5M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $9.0B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $531.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $425.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 15.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $1.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $531.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $414.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $635.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $622.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $441.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $466.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $657.1M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $425.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $312.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $521.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $522.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $373.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $591.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $550.1M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 22.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 1.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
