vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Digital Realty (DLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.3× Digital Realty). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 0.6%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.1% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Realty's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.
CE vs DLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 16.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | -10.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $80.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $2.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $22.9B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $49.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $21.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $21.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $48.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $48.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $45.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $45.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $45.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $43.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $719.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $641.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $399.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $769.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $566.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $573.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 7.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 11.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 7.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
DLR
Segment breakdown not available.
