vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Hyatt Hotels Corp (H). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.2× Hyatt Hotels Corp). Celanese Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -1.1%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyatt Hotels Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs -7.0%). Hyatt Hotels Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($236.0M vs $168.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Hyatt Hotels Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.2% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Hyatt Hotels Corporation, commonly known as Hyatt Hotels & Resorts, is an American multinational hospitality company headquartered in the Riverside Plaza area of Chicago that manages and franchises luxury and business hotels, resorts, and vacation properties. Hyatt Hotels & Resorts is one of the businesses managed by the Pritzker family. Hyatt has more than 1350 hotels and all-inclusive properties in 69 countries, across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
CE vs H — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $-20.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 0.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 11.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 64.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $-56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $471.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $359.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $522.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 30.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $4.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $3.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $4.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $813.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $14.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $813.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $749.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $912.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $15.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $12.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $11.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $313.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $236.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $159.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $235.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $242.0M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $236.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $-89.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-111.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $184.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $-64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $208.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | -0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
H
| Other | $627.0M | 35% |
| Rooms Revenue | $326.0M | 18% |
| Net Fees | $290.0M | 16% |
| Distribution Segment | $177.0M | 10% |
| Franchise And Other Fees | $114.0M | 6% |
| Base Management Fees | $112.0M | 6% |
| Incentive Management Fees | $81.0M | 5% |
| Other Owned And Leased Hotel Revenue | $41.0M | 2% |
| Contra Revenue | $17.0M | 1% |
| Other Revenues | $4.0M | 0% |
