vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 2.0× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 0.6%, a 13.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
CE vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
