vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.2× SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs 0.6%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs -7.0%). Celanese Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
CE vs SGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $14.0M | $140.8M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.7% | 95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $140.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-33.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $106.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.0M | $76.3M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 44.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 43.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.4B | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $21.7B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.81× | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $559.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $564.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $411.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $326.6M |
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | 1.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 6.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 3.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.54× | 5.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.56× | 7.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $252.0M | $99.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $168.0M | $41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 18.00× | 0.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $803.0M | $633.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $408.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $186.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $256.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0M | $150.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | $130.2M |
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $360.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $149.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $240.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | $98.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.88× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
