vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celanese Corp (CE) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celanese Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.4× Take-Two Interactive). Celanese Corp runs the higher net margin — 2.1% vs -5.5%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs -2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
CE vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Net Margin | 2.1% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.2% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 340.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.4B |
| Q3 26 | — | $-92.9M | ||
| Q1 26 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9B | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $-365.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 26 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 53.8% |
| Q3 26 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.7% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | -22.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.1% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -27.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.39 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.81 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.50 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $-2.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $879.6M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3B | — |
| Q3 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $5.8B |
| Q3 26 | — | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 26 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.7B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.2B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9B | $13.1B |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $871.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $252.0M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $-128.4M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.0M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.0M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.0M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $-165.2M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -12.2% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.7% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CE
Segment breakdown not available.
TTWO
| Game | $1.6B | 92% |
| Advertising | $128.7M | 8% |
