vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Bristow Group Inc. (VTOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($721.6M vs $377.3M, roughly 1.9× Bristow Group Inc.). Bristow Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 3.4%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 6.7%). Bristow Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($47.8M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Bristow Helicopters Limited is a British civil helicopter operator originally based at Aberdeen Airport, Scotland, which is currently a part of the U.S.-based Bristow Group which in turn has its corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S. In 2020, Bristow Group was merged with Era Helicopters, a large U.S.-based commercial helicopter operator that was previously a division of Era Aviation, with the two companies then continuing to use the Bristow name.
CELH vs VTOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $377.3M |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $18.4M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $377.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $386.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $376.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $350.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $353.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $365.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $359.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $337.1M |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $1.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $286.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | $671.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $286.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $191.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $247.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $178.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $140.6M |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | $671.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | $675.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | $705.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $701.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $689.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $629.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $594.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $544.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $984.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $931.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $891.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $849.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $820.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $76.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $47.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $56.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $76.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $-603.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $-52.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $-37.9M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | -15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | -0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | 4.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
VTOL
| Offshore Energy Services | $247.5M | 66% |
| Government Services | $100.1M | 27% |
| Other | $21.9M | 6% |
| Related Party | $7.8M | 2% |